Library research techniques

I thought class tonight was refreshing.

As I listened to Government Information/GIS Librarian Joy Suh, I started thinking about ways I could make my stories richer and more informative.

I do worry, though, about overwhelming my readers with too many toys and multimedia add-ons. Something tells me that my readers would not feel that that is possible, though. I guess, in some ways, my real fear, then, is giving my readers so many toys that they won’t pay attention to my words. I am a word person. I worry about things like this.

I did get some ideas from Suh for things that I want to try, to incorporate into my work. I liked her tips about how to incorporate maps into my work. I think people can get some good information from maps.

I also liked the information that Suh provided about how to look up court cases on the library website.

I like writing court case stories and I think people like reading them. People need to know about the laws that affect them and how they are changing or how leaders are changing their interpretations of them.

I did think that I will need more time to figure out how to implement some of her other tips into my work. I think, for instance, that I would need more time to conduct research for stories using books and materials obtained from other libraries. I tend to think of news reporting as more immediate and less drawn-out. I know some reporters do long-term stories. Maybe I should become one of them.

I have given some thought to writing a news-style book. Maybe I could use some of this information for that purpose.

I am grateful, in any case for the lessons I received tonight. I just have to figure out how to make the best use of them.

 

 

One thought on “Library research techniques

  1. What I hear you saying is it is important to know who your audience is and what it is they want. The lure of the lots of pictures, video and infographics if not used judiciously could overwhelm the story. Honestly, too many editors use lots of pictures to cover up a story lacking in any kind of substantive depth. I vote for an “elegant balance” of the two!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *